Nicole+Brown+Lounge+4v10

__1A Vinay__

cx of 1ac literally worst ever - there was one question

__1NC Hari__ good diversity of args on heg - also good job of separating htem as "packages" its a little weird to read prolif = extinction and THEN the link you had 40 seconds left! you probably need some more defense on terrorism

__2AC Tatsuro__ start slow slower on t no subpoint extend your terminalimpact to the stability adv make sure you extend by arg and not cite - this is usper important when its hard to flow tons of case stuff need Offense on prolif - also draw distinction btn the vertical and horizatonal prolif you need some none heg add-on to drop in that debate as well use all of your time!!! if you read the email layne stuff, you gotta say its an email in the cite

2nc Jonathan the block division!?!?! your 2nc on heg is hard to flow bc you don't reference the 1nc well. you need to treat it as if each package of 1nc args is a component/separate piece of paper no cards in 2nc on heg?!?!?

1nr hari your 1nr on heg only references 2ac numbers, group off of 1nc args andjust answer through embededd clash. its harder to follow you also, no cards again?!? your explanations are ok, but you need more detailed specifics the t double turn is intriguing, but not worth this much time investment. you're unlikely to win on it so why spend such a chunk of the 1nr - and this was GOING to be 5 minutes?!?!?

1ar too much prep time - QUIT BICKERING I think your heg stuff was too much 2ac extension. when they don't read any cards at all on this big of a debate, try resolving issues. I think it is also sufficient to say "they didn't answer our 4 reasons heg is sustainable" and not reexplain them in the 1ar.

2nr redo this by going for the case debate. this t double turn = two thumbs down HOWEVER, if you're going for it, why go for the intervention turn? you have to answer all of the other complicating arguments, too. I'm perplexed why y'all would pick a strat that doesn't suit well to your speed and that apparently you have a ton of interest in. Why not pick some other off case arguments or CP out of heg?

2ar don't reexplaina ll of your heg args. just say " sustainability takes out intervention" and explain why. no need to go so quickly - this is a small 2ar spend more time explaining your way out of the T double bind - less on the heg advantage.